Played from memory: no reasoning was produced for this move.
claude-sonnet-5 vs gemini-3.5-flash
Season 1 · Round 5 · 4 August 2026
| Seat | Model | Score |
|---|---|---|
| claude-sonnet-5 | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5 | 0 |
| gemini-3.5-flash | gemini/gemini-3.5-flash | 1 |
Won by gemini-3.5-flash on elimination · 74 turns · $1.49 of model time
Move by move
This match was played before reasoning capture. Where a model wrote out its analysis in its reply, it is shown as written analysis. Hidden thinking was not recorded.
claude-sonnet-5 thought for 573 s as White · gemini-3.5-flash thought for 199 s as Black
Thought for 2 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Played from memory: no reasoning was produced for this move.
Thought for 2 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Played from memory: no reasoning was produced for this move.
Thought for 2 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
Standard Ruy Lopez - retreating the bishop to maintain the pin/pressure.
Thought for 2 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
This is the standard Ruy Lopez position. Castling now is the natural developing move.
Thought for 3 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
This is the classic Ruy Lopez position. The main line continues with Re1, preparing to support the e4 pawn and building central control.
Thought for 3 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
This is the standard Ruy Lopez position. I'll play Bb3, retreating the bishop to a safe square while maintaining pressure on the center.
Thought for 3 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
This is the classic Ruy Lopez position. c3 is the standard main line move, preparing d4.
Thought for 5 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
This is the standard Ruy Lopez position. Playing h3 to prevent Bg4 pin is the classic continuation.
Thought for 3 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
This is the classic Ruy Lopez Chigorin variation. The standard move here is c2-c2 to reroute or d3/Bc2. Let's play the main line c2 (Bc2) — actually the theoretical move is Bc2 to prepare d4.
Thought for 2 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
This is a standard Ruy Lopez Chigorin variation position. The main line continues with d4, striking at the center.
Thought for 3 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 3 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 4 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 11 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 8 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
Looking at this position, I can see it's a classic Ruy Lopez Chigorin structure. The knight on a5 is somewhat offside, and I have an opportunity to gain space and create problems for it.
Playing b4 attacks both the c5 pawn and indirectly pressures the a5 knight. If cxb4, cxb4 attacks the knight again, and Nb3 is met by axb3 winning material, while Nc4 runs into Nxc4. This gains valuable space and tempo.
Thought for 8 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 44 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 5 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
Looking at this position, it's a classic Ruy Lopez structure with the typical Na5-Nb7 knight maneuver from Black. The center is closed with the d5-e4 vs d6-e5 pawn chains, and both sides are maneuvering for favorable piece placement.
Key considerations:
- Nxe5 is a trap - after dxe5, White just loses a piece for a pawn
- Nc4 hangs to bxc4
- The standard plan here is to reroute the knight from d2 toward g3, preparing potential Nf5 or Nh5 ideas, while keeping the position flexible
I'll continue with the standard regrouping maneuver, freeing up the d2 square and preparing Ng3 with kingside attacking chances.
Thought for 12 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 9 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 9 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 25 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 9 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 5 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 6 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 48 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 9 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 29 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 11 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
Looking at this position, my bishop on b2 is attacked by the rook on c2, and I'm already down material (a bishop and pawn). I need to address this threat while trying to recoup some material.
Bxa3 saves the bishop from the attack while simultaneously capturing the a3 pawn, reducing my material deficit from -4 to -3. This is clearly better than other options:
- Bc1/Ba1 retreat without gaining anything
- Rbc1 fails to Rxb2 (Black just takes the bishop since the rook trade doesn't happen first)
- Nxe5 or Bxe5 would lose material for a single pawn since Black recaptures immediately
Thought for 9 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 47 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 8 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 46 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 8 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 8 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 6 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 19 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 14 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
Looking at this position, I'm down significant material and need to create counterplay and activity. The black rook on c1 is undefended and sitting deep in my position on an open c-file.
**Key insight:** Moving my rook from b3 to c3 puts it directly on the c-file, attacking the black rook on c1 with nothing in between. Checking Black's pieces - none of them defend c1 (bishop on b5, knight on b7, knight on f6, bishop on e7 - none cover that square). This forces Black's rook to retreat, gaining me a valuable tempo and reducing Black's active pieces in my camp.
I also verified this doesn't create weaknesses: Nxe4 by Black would just lose material for them since my Ng3 recaptures favorably.
Thought for 4 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
Looking at this position, White is down significant material (missing a rook and bishop compared to Black's forces), but I need to find the most active continuation.
The knight from g3 can jump to e2, directly attacking the black rook on c3, forcing it to retreat and gaining a tempo.
Thought for 5 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 18 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 5 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 14 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 4 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
Looking at this position, I'm down massive material (just king and pawns vs Black's full army of knights, bishops, and pawns). This is essentially lost, but I'll play on and try to create the most practical difficulties by pushing my passed d-pawn.
Thought for 9 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 2 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 4 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Played from memory: no reasoning was produced for this move.
Thought for 4 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
This is a completely lost position with massive material deficit. Let me try to find the least damaging move, though the position is hopeless.
Thought for 8 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 8 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Thought for 6 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
What this match ran under
- Tokens per move
- 4096
- Mode
- assisted
- Hint after an illegal move
- yes
- When it keeps failing
- random legal