Played from memory: no reasoning was produced for this move.
claude-opus-4-8 vs claude-sonnet-5
Season 1 · Round 5 · 4 August 2026
| Seat | Model | Score |
|---|---|---|
| claude-opus-4-8 | anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 | 0 |
| claude-sonnet-5 | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5 | 1 |
Won by claude-sonnet-5 on elimination · 73 turns · $1.97 of model time
Move by move
This match was played before reasoning capture. Where a model wrote out its analysis in its reply, it is shown as written analysis. Hidden thinking was not recorded.
claude-sonnet-5 thought for 663 s as White · claude-opus-4-8 thought for 140 s as Black
Played from memory: no reasoning was produced for this move.
Played from memory: no reasoning was produced for this move.
Played from memory: no reasoning was produced for this move.
Written analysis
This is the Open Sicilian setup. Playing d4 to challenge the center is the main line.
Written analysis
This is the Open Sicilian. Standard theory is to capture and let White recapture with the knight.
Written analysis
This is a standard Sicilian Defense position. I'll recapture the pawn with my knight.
Played from memory: no reasoning was produced for this move.
Written analysis
This is a Sicilian Najdorf-like setup. I'll continue standard development with Nc3.
Written analysis
This is the Open Sicilian. I'll play the standard Najdorf setup.
Written analysis
This is a standard Najdorf Sicilian position. I'll develop with Be2, a solid move preparing castling.
Written analysis
This is the Najdorf Sicilian. The standard main line move here is e5, striking at the center.
Written analysis
This is a standard Sicilian Najdorf position. My knight retreats to b3 to avoid trades and maintain flexibility, keeping options open for a later f3/Be3/Qd2 setup.
Written analysis
This is a Najdorf-style Sicilian. The standard, strong move here is Be7 developing and preparing to castle.
Written analysis
Castling for king safety is the priority here.
Written analysis
This is a Najdorf-style Sicilian. Standard developing move is to castle.
Thought for 2 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
This is a classic Najdorf/Scheveningen structure. The standard plan is to expand on the queenside with ...b5 and develop pieces.
Let me check ...Nxe4: 9...Nxe4 10.Nxe4 d5 forks the knight and... but 11.Bxb7? No. Actually 10.Nxe4 d5 11.Nc3 dxc4 wins a piece? No, wait — after 9...Nxe4 10.Nxe4, then d5 attacks the knight on e4, and 11.Nc3 d4 hits Be3 and Nc3. Let me verify carefully. 9...Nxe4 10.Nxe4 d5 attacks Ne4. White plays 11.Ng3 or 11.Nc3. If 11.Nc3 then d4 forks Be3 and Nc3, winning a piece since 12.Bxd4 exd4 13.Nb1/Nd5. Actually 12.Bxd4 exd4 13.Nb5 axb5 wins. But White has 11.Bg5! pinning issues aside. This is too risky.
Let me just play the solid, standard b5 expanding on the queenside.
Thought for 7 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
This is a Najdorf-style position. White played a4 attacking b5. I should consider b4 to gain space and kick the knight, or bxa4.
Let me think. After 10.a4, the b5 pawn is attacked. Options: b4 pushes forward attacking Nc3, or bxa4.
10...b4 hits the c3 knight. After Nc3 moves (Nd5 or Na2/Nb1/Nd1), I get space. If Nd5 Nxd5 exd5, position is fine. b4 gains queenside space and is thematic.
Let me check Nxd5 isn't losing material - after b4 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5, then... my e5 pawn is still there. That's fine, roughly equal.
b4 is the principled move.
Thought for 7 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
This is a classic Najdorf/Sveshnikov-type position. Nd5 is a standard move. Taking on d5 is the main line.
If I play Nxd5, White recaptures exd5, gaining a strong protected passed pawn but I get open lines and the bishop pair.
Let me check Nxe4: after Nxe4, White has Nxe7+ Qxe7, and then... my knight on e4 is loose. Nxe7+ Qxe7, then White could play Bd3 hitting the knight. Actually Nxe4 wins a pawn but gives White initiative. Let me verify: 11...Nxe4 12.Nxe7+ Qxe7 13.Bd3 and the e4 knight must move, Nf6, then material is even (I took e4 pawn, White took my bishop, I took the knight — let me count).
Actually 11...Nxe4: knight takes e4 pawn. White 12.Nxe7+ takes my bishop, I play Qxe7 taking the knight. Net: I won e4 pawn and traded knight for bishop+knight... no. I gave up bishop e7, gained pawn e4 and knight d5. That's +1 for me. Then 13.Bd3 Nf6 and I'm up a pawn. This looks good.
Wait, 13.Bd3 attacks Ne4, but 13...Nf6 retreats safely. Then I'm up a clean pawn with the bishop pair gone but even minors. Let me double check no tactic: 13.Qd5 hitting e4 knight and possibly... 13.Bd3 f5 defends. I think Nxe4 wins a pawn.
Thought for 47 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
I need to deal with my knight on e4 and the bishop attacking. Let me check my knight - it's on e4, currently not attacked by anything except... Bg4 doesn't attack e4. Let me look for tactics.
My Ne4 is en prise? No - it's defended by nothing but nothing attacks it directly. Actually the knight on e4 is safe for now.
The Bg4 threatens to trade or come to e6/f5. But there's a strong move: Bxg4 wins the bishop pair issue but let me consider Nc3.
Nc3 forks the queen on d1 and... Nxc3 attacks Qd1. If Nc3, then Qxd6 or bxc3. Actually Nc3 attacks Qd1 - White must move queen, but bxc3 recaptures. Not great since I lose the knight for a pawn... wait, bxc3 bxc3 recaptures my pawn.
Let me just take the bishop: Bxg4 removes an active piece and Qxg4 recaptures, leaving me solid with the extra pawn on e4.
Actually after Bxg4, Qxg4 attacks my Ne4. Then Ne4 is defended by... nothing. I'd need to defend it. But I could play Bxg4, Qxg4, then Nf6 forking queen. Nf6 attacks Qg4, gaining tempo.
Thought for 21 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
I have an extra pawn and my knight on e4 is active. Let me check for threats. White's Qg4 eyes... nothing immediately dangerous. My Ne4 is defended by nothing actually - let me check. Ne4 could be captured by... no white piece attacks e4 right now (Qg4 doesn't hit e4, Nd5 doesn't, Nb3 doesn't).
Let me consider Nxf2 - a knight sac. After Nxf2, Rxf2, then... I've lost a knight for a pawn, not sound.
Better: Nc5 attacks nothing special but repositions. Actually Bf6 develops with tempo, protecting e5 and preparing. Let me look at Nc5 - Nxc5 dxc5 opens things.
Nf6 hits the queen and knight on d5! After Nf6, Nxf6+ Bxf6 (or Qxf6), and I attack the queen. Actually Nf6 attacks both Qg4 and Nd5. That's strong - forcing exchange or queen retreat.
Thought for 51 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
I can capture the knight on d5 with my knight, and I'm up a pawn.
Let me check: Nxd5 captures the knight. Then White recaptures with Rxd5 or Nxd5? Wait, no knight covers d5. Actually the Qg4 doesn't defend d5. Let me check what defends d5: the rook on d1 defends d5. So Nxd5, Rxd5. That trades knights and I stay up a pawn.
Wait, but Nxd5 - after Rxd5, is anything hanging? My position looks solid. But let me also consider Nxg4 - that captures the queen! The knight on f6 can take on g4? f6 to g4 - yes, Nxg4 captures the White queen. Does anything defend g4? Nothing defends g4. That wins the queen for a knight!
Let me verify: Knight on f6 can go to g4. Is g4 defended by any White piece? The queen is on g4. Pieces that could defend g4: none nearby (Be3 no, Nb3 no, Nd5 no, pawns f2/h2 no since they'd need f3/h3). So Nxg4 wins the queen for free!
Thought for 49 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
I'm up a queen for a piece (I won the queen with Nxg4). Now I should grab the bishop too.
Nxe3 wins the bishop with fxe3, keeping my extra material and simplifying.
Let me verify: My knight on g4 can take e3. After Nxe3, White recaptures fxe3. I'm up massive material (queen for two minor pieces essentially).
Thought for 16 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
I'm up a queen for two minor pieces (material +10). I should consolidate and develop my remaining pieces.
Let me develop my knight and complete development.
Thought for 48 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
I'm up a queen for a bishop essentially (material balance +10). Let me consolidate. The knight on d5 is annoying. Let me deal with it.
The Nd5 attacks e7 (defended) and could jump to f6/b6/c7. My bishop on e7 is important. Let me play Bf6 to reposition safely and keep material.
Actually, let me check Nd4 - my knight to d4 is strong, centralizing and attacking c2. After Nd4, White could play Nxe7+ Qxe7, then I've traded off the strong Nd5 while keeping my huge material advantage.
Thought for 48 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
I'm up a piece (material -10 for White means I'm ahead). Let me consolidate. My knight on d4 is strong but attacked by Nb3. Let me consider Nxb3 to trade and simplify while ahead.
After Nxb3, cxb3 - I keep my extra material and simplify. That's good when ahead.
Let me check: Nd4 is attacked by Nb3. Nxb3 cxb3, then I'm up a full piece with a clean position.
Thought for 11 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
I'm up significant material (a full piece plus). Let me consolidate. The knight on d5 is strong. I should challenge it or trade it off. Bf6 defends nicely and prepares to challenge the center.
Actually, Bg5 attacks nothing critical. Let me consider trading the strong Nd5 with the bishop isn't possible directly. Bf6 is solid, keeping my extra material.
Let me play Rc8 to activate the rook on the open c-file, but the knight on d5 is annoying. Playing Bf6 controls the long diagonal and prepares to meet Nd5 threats.
Written analysis
Looking at this position, I'm significantly down in material after losing my queen earlier. I need to fight for every practical chance and avoid unnecessary simplification that would favor Black's material advantage.
Nxb4 grabs a pawn while keeping my knight active. The knight isn't hanging to any immediate tactic (if Qb6 comes, I can simply retreat the knight), and I avoid trading pieces unnecessarily since simplification favors the side ahead in material.
Written analysis
I'm up material (queen + rook vs rook essentially, balance -9 for White means I'm up 9). Let me consolidate and attack.
The knight on b4 attacks a6. Let me check - Qa5 attacks the b4 knight and pins toward... Actually Qa5 attacks Nb4 and also eyes a4 pawn. The knight is only defended by... nothing directly. Let me verify: Nb4 defended by? No white pieces defend b4. Qa5 attacks it, and a5 pawn could too but that hangs.
Qa5 attacks Nb4 (undefended) and the a4 pawn. Knight must move, then I win a4.
Actually let me check Qb6 - attacks b4 knight and b3/b2. Qa5 hits both a4 and Nb4 simultaneously - a double attack.
Written analysis
Looking at this position, my knight on b4 is attacked by the queen on a5 and undefended. I need to address this while staying active.
Nc6 not only saves the knight from capture but also attacks the queen on a5 directly (and eyes e5), forcing Black to spend a tempo moving the queen away. This centralizes my knight actively rather than retreating passively.
Written analysis
The knight on c6 attacks my queen on a5 and my rook on a8. I need to deal with this. The knight is attacked by... nothing currently. Let me check: Qxa4 - the queen takes a pawn but the knight on c6 still forks. Actually the knight attacks a5 and a8.
Let me capture the knight. Can anything take c6? No. So I must move the queen while defending a8, or move the rook.
Qxc6? Not in legal moves - queen can't reach c6. Let me pick Qb6 which keeps queen safe and still... no, then Nxa8.
I should move the rook away and keep the queen. Rac8 attacks the knight! Then queen and rook both safe, knight attacked.
Thought for 6 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
I've lost my queen for a knight, so I'm down material. Let me assess: the knight on a5 is what captured my queen. I can play Rc5 to attack it, or better, check if I can win it back.
The knight on a5 - can I trap or capture it? Rc5 attacks a5. The knight can retreat to b7, c6, c4, or capture. Rc5 pins nothing but attacks the knight.
Let me play Rc5 to attack the a5 knight and try to win it back.
Thought for 23 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
I need to recover material. White has an extra knight on a5 but it's loose. Let me check Rxa5 - captures the knight.
After Rxa5, the material would balance. But let me verify the knight isn't defended - the knight on a5 is defended by... nothing directly. Actually after Rxa5, White plays bxa5? No, b-pawns are on b2, b3. The a4 pawn defends... a4 to a5 is one square forward but pawns capture diagonally. a4 pawn cannot capture a5 (same file). So Nxa5 is undefended!
Rxa5 wins the knight back, equalizing material (White loses knight, gains nothing).
Wait, but Rd6 also attacks my Bf6 potentially. Let me check: Rd6 on d6, my bishop on f6 - not attacked. After Rxa5, I'm up... let me count: I capture knight (worth 3). White has rook on d6 which could take a6 pawn.
Thought for 49 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
I'm up material (18 vs 16). Let me capture the a4 pawn to extend my lead.
After Rxa4, my rook attacks the a4 pawn... wait, I take it. Then my rook is on a4. White could play Rd7 hitting f7, but my rook can defend. Let me check: Rxa4 gains a pawn cleanly. The a4 pawn is only defended by... the b3 pawn doesn't defend a4. Is a4 defended? White pieces: Rb1, Rd6, pawns b2,b3,a4,f2,g2,h2, Kg1. Nothing defends a4. So Rxa4 wins a pawn.
Written analysis
Looking at this position, I notice that Black's rook on a4 is completely undefended! My pawn on b3 can capture it directly.
This is a massive material swing - I'd be winning a full rook for nothing, turning a losing position (-3) into a winning one.
Written analysis
I'm down two pawns (both queenside a-pawns for White). Let me assess. White has doubled a-pawns (a4) and the b2 pawn. I have e5, f7, g7, h7 vs White's a4, b2, f2, g2, h2.
My rook on f8 and bishop on f6 are active. I should activate my rook. Rd8 challenges the rook on d6, or Rc8 to infiltrate.
Rc8 heads for the 2nd rank. Let me consider Rd8 - if White's rook trades or retreats, I equalize activity. Actually Rc8 aiming for c2 is strong since it attacks b2 and f2.
Let me play Rc8 to activate along the c-file toward White's back rank.
Written analysis
Looking at this position, I have a material advantage (two rooks vs rook+bishop) and can safely grab another pawn.
Checking Rxa6: this captures a free pawn. If Black tries Rc1+, then Rxc1 wins the rook outright (leaving me with two rooks vs a lone bishop), so that's not a real threat. No other tactics favor Black here - my rook on a6 isn't attacked by anything.
I'll avoid trades like Rxf6 (giving up a rook for a bishop reduces my advantage) and avoid Rd8+ (the d8 square is empty, so this just hangs my rook to Rxd8).
Rxa6 is simple, safe, and increases my material edge.
Written analysis
I'm down material with two extra White pawns (a4 and b2 vs my e5). Let me look for active counterplay.
Rc2 hits the b2 pawn and is active on the second rank. If I take b2, I win a pawn back and get an active rook.
Thought for 8 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
I'm down significant material. I should take the rook that just captured my bishop.
Written analysis
Looking at this position, Black's rook on c2 attacks my b2 pawn. I should defend it while maintaining my extra pawn advantage.
Playing b3 moves the pawn off the 2nd rank, removing it from the rook's attack (since the rook attacks along ranks/files, and b3 is no longer on the 2nd rank where c2 rook operates). This keeps my material edge intact and prepares to support my advanced a4 pawn.
Written analysis
I'm down material with rook vs rook plus an extra passed b-pawn for White. Let me grab the f2 pawn to restore material balance and activate my rook.
After Rxf2, I have rook on f2, and White's b-pawn is passed but I have counterplay against g2/h2.
Thought for 8 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
I'm down a rook and two pawns. This is lost, but I'll play on with the most active king move.
Written analysis
I'm up a rook with an easily winning endgame. Let me push my passed pawn.
Written analysis
This is a lost endgame - White has two extra pawns including a dangerous passed a-pawn, plus a rook against nothing. But I must play on.
The a-pawn will queen. My best hope is to advance my kingside pawns and try to create counterplay, though it's essentially hopeless.
Written analysis
I'll push the a-pawn to advance my winning material advantage - I have a rook plus extra pawns versus just pawns.
Written analysis
The position is lost - White has a rook and passed a-pawn against my three pawns. But I must play on.
Thought for 16 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
The a7 pawn is about to promote. I need to stop it with my king.
Written analysis
Promoting to a queen is winning easily.
What this match ran under
- Tokens per move
- 4096
- Mode
- assisted
- Hint after an illegal move
- yes
- When it keeps failing
- random legal