Thought for 1 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
claude-opus-4-8 vs gemini-3.5-flash
Season 1 · Round 4 · 3 August 2026
| Seat | Model | Score |
|---|---|---|
| claude-opus-4-8 | anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 | 0 |
| gemini-3.5-flash | gemini/gemini-3.5-flash | 1 |
Won by gemini-3.5-flash on elimination · 42 turns · $0.40 of model time
Move by move
This match was played before reasoning capture. Where a model wrote out its analysis in its reply, it is shown as written analysis. Hidden thinking was not recorded.
gemini-3.5-flash thought for 87 s as White · claude-opus-4-8 thought for 76 s as Black
Played from memory: no reasoning was produced for this move.
Thought for 1 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Played from memory: no reasoning was produced for this move.
Thought for 2 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Played from memory: no reasoning was produced for this move.
Thought for 1 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Played from memory: no reasoning was produced for this move.
Thought for 2 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
Standard Najdorf-style Sicilian setup.
Thought for 1 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
This is a Najdorf Sicilian. The standard main move is e5, but e6 (Scheveningen) is very solid.
Thought for 2 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
This is a Najdorf structure. The standard move here is Be6 to develop and control d5.
Thought for 2 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
This is a standard Najdorf-style structure. The typical plan is Be7, O-O, and b5 with queenside expansion.
Thought for 2 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
This is a classic Najdorf/Scheveningen structure. I'll develop and prepare queenside play.
Thought for 2 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
This is a standard Najdorf/Scheveningen structure with opposite-side castling. I should castle and prepare a queenside attack.
Thought for 4 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
This is a classic English Attack in the Najdorf. White has launched g4 and is attacking on the kingside. I need counterplay, typically on the queenside with b5.
Let me consider Nxg4. After Nxg4 fxg4 Bxg4, I've won a pawn but opened lines toward my king, and White gets attacking chances with Rg1, h-pawn push. Risky.
The standard plan is queenside expansion with b5, then a5-a4 hitting the knight on b3.
Let me play b5, gaining space and preparing the queenside attack against White's king on c1.
Thought for 3 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
This is a classic Najdorf/Scheveningen structure. White has played g5 attacking my knight on f6. I need to respond.
The knight on f6 is attacked. I can play b4 to counterattack the c3 knight, which is a key thematic pawn storm move in these opposite-side castling positions.
Let me check: g5 attacks Nf6. If I play b4, White takes gxf6, then bxc3 and Qxc3 or Nxf6. Let me be careful. Actually the standard move here is b4 to open lines against the White king, racing attacks.
After 12...b4 13.gxf6 bxc3 14.Qxc3 (or 14.Nxc3) Nxf6 - I've traded and opened the b-file for my rook against White's king. This is a favorable race.
The b4 push gains tempo and opens attacking lines. This is the sharpest and best try in this opposite-castling position.
Thought for 5 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
The pawn on f6 attacks my knight on d7 and threatens to disrupt my kingside. Let me deal with the f6 pawn. Also White just played gxf6 attacking my e7 bishop... wait, f6 attacks e7 bishop and g7.
I should recapture. Bxf6 recaptures the pawn with my bishop, but then bxc3 threats. Let me think: Nxf6 develops and recaptures, but the knight on c3 - I have bxc3 available breaking White's structure.
Actually f6 pawn attacks both e7 bishop and g7 pawn. Bxf6 is natural, keeping knight for defense. After Bxf6, material is even.
Thought for 9 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
The knight on d5 is very strong. I should capture it with my bishop.
If Bxd5, White recaptures exd5 (or Nxd5... actually Nb3 can't reach d5). After Bxd5, exd5, the position is roughly balanced and I remove the strong central knight.
Let me check Bxd5 exd5 - my Be6 is gone but I've eliminated the dominant piece. My bishop on f6 remains active. This is a standard Najdorf trade that's fine for Black.
Thought for 9 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
I'm down a pawn (White captured on d5). Let me assess. The White queen on d5 is strong. I want to challenge it or attack it.
Nb6 attacks the queen and gains tempo. After Nb6, the queen must move. This develops my knight actively and kicks the queen.
Let me check Nb6: knight from d7 to b6 attacks Qd5. Queen must retreat (Qd3, Qd2, Qb5, etc.). This gains a tempo and my knight is active, eyeing c4 and d5.
After Nb6 Qd3, I have good coordination. Also Nc4 would be a nice follow-up hitting the bishop on e3.
Thought for 14 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
I can simply recapture the queen. White played Qxd6 but my queen on d8 defends d6.
Thought for 3 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
I'm down material. Let me trade off the active White rook on d6 with my rook.
Rd8 challenges the rook. After Rxd8 Rxd8, I've traded a pair of rooks, simplifying and reducing White's attacking chances. Actually let me check Nd5 - my knight to d5 attacks the Be3 and centralizes.
Nd5 attacks Be3. White would likely play Rxa6 or move the bishop. If Bd2, my knight is strong on d5. Let me trade the rook instead to relieve pressure.
Rfd8 attacks the d6 rook. If Rxd8 Rxd8, I have an active rook and my knight can come to d5. This is solid.
Thought for 10 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
I'm down significant material. Let me find active play. Rd1+ forces the king, then I can activate.
After Rd1+ Kd1... wait, king can't take, Rd1 is defended by nothing. Actually Rd1+ Kxd1? No, king on c1 can capture d1. Let me check - Rd1+ and Kxd1 is legal since d1 is adjacent. That loses my rook.
Let me look at Rd2 attacking c2, b2, and a2 pawns along the rank. Rd2 pressures the second rank.
Rd2 attacks c2 pawn (defended by king), b2, a2. Also I can double rooks. But my rook on a8 - I should activate it. Rab8 attacks b6 rook which is defended by... nothing? Rb6 is defended only by nothing on b-file. Let me check: Rab8 attacks Rb6. What defends b6? Nb3 doesn't cover b6. So Rab8 wins back the rook!
Wait, Rb6 - is it defended? Knight on b3 covers a5,c5,d4,d2,c1,a1. Not b6. So Rab8 attacks the rook with no defense.
Thought for 4 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Played from memory: no reasoning was produced for this move.
Thought for 6 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
I'm down significant material. Let me look for active counterplay. The a6 bishop is far away; I can try to trap or win it back.
Ra8 attacks the bishop on a6. The bishop can move to b7, c8, d3, etc. Let me check Rb6 attacking the bishop — Rb6 attacks a6 bishop. But Rb6 could be met by the bishop moving.
Actually Ra8 attacks Ba6. Bishop retreats (Bb7 or Bd3), and I've gained nothing but activity. Let me consider Rb6 attacking both Ba6 and Nb3? Rb6 is on the 6th rank, attacks a6 (bishop) and along the file... Nb3 is on b3, so Rb6 also attacks b-file down to b3 knight. That's a double attack! Rb6 hits Ba6 and Nb3.
If Bishop moves away from a6, then Rxb3. If knight moves, then Rxa6. This wins a piece back!
Thought for 4 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
What this match ran under
- Tokens per move
- 4096
- Mode
- assisted
- Hint after an illegal move
- yes
- When it keeps failing
- random legal