Played from memory: no reasoning was produced for this move.
claude-opus-4-8 vs gemini-3.1-pro-preview
Season 1 · Round 4 · 2 August 2026
| Seat | Model | Score |
|---|---|---|
| claude-opus-4-8 | anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 | 0 |
| gemini-3.1-pro-preview | gemini/gemini-3.1-pro-preview | 1 |
Won by gemini-3.1-pro-preview on elimination · 42 turns · $0.58 of model time
Move by move
This match was played before reasoning capture. Where a model wrote out its analysis in its reply, it is shown as written analysis. Hidden thinking was not recorded.
claude-opus-4-8 thought for 96 s as White · gemini-3.1-pro-preview thought for 262 s as Black
Thought for 4 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Played from memory: no reasoning was produced for this move.
Thought for 5 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Played from memory: no reasoning was produced for this move.
Thought for 10 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Played from memory: no reasoning was produced for this move.
Thought for 3 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
Standard Open Sicilian, developing the knight to c3.
Thought for 7 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
This is the Najdorf Sicilian. The main line is Be2 or Be3.
Thought for 9 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
This is the Najdorf Sicilian. The standard move is Nb3, but Nf5 and Nf3 are also options. The main line is to retreat the knight to b3.
Thought for 11 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
This is a Najdorf structure. The classic strong move is Bg5, pinning the knight and pressuring d5/f6.
Thought for 12 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
This is a classic Najdorf/Boleslavsky structure. The standard strong move here is Nd5, which is well known to give White a lasting positional edge by exchanging Black's good knight or bishop.
Let me check Bxf6 first, then Nd5. Bxf6 Bxf6 removes a defender of d5, then Nd5 hits the bishop. Actually the main line is Nd5 immediately.
After Nd5, Black often plays Bxd5 exd5 Nbd7. White gets the bishop pair and the d5 outpost/space. If Nxd5 exd5 Bf5, still fine for White.
Nd5 is the principled, strong move.
Thought for 27 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
This is the classic Sveshnikov/Najdorf structure. Black played Nxd5. I should recapture with exd5, hitting the bishop on e6.
After exd5, the e6 bishop is attacked and must move, giving me a good position with pressure on d5.
Thought for 13 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
I can win a piece here. The bishop on g5 is undefended, and my bishop on e2 can pin/attack while dxe6 wins material. Let me check: dxe6 captures the bishop on e6. After dxe6, the pawn on e6 attacks... but what about my bishop being hanging? Actually let me evaluate dxe6 - it captures a bishop for a pawn, winning a piece!
After 11. dxe6, Black has bishop on g5 still hanging too, but I've already won the e6 bishop. Black would recapture the e6 pawn with fxe6, but I've traded pawn for bishop = up a piece.
Wait, dxe6 is my d5 pawn capturing on e6. That wins the bishop for free (only fxe6 recaptures the pawn). Net: I win a bishop for a pawn.
Thought for 8 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
I can win a pawn with Qxd6, but let me check safety. After Qxd6 Qxd6, no wait, my queen would be on d6. Black could play Qd7 or the position gets loose. Let me check Qd5 - attacks e5 and e6, and hits b7.
Qd5 attacks e6, e5, and b7 simultaneously. Black must defend. Actually Qxd6 wins a clean pawn: after Qxd6 Qxd6? No, Black's queen is on d8, can it take? Qd8xd6 yes. Then I've traded queens but... no I gained a pawn. Wait after Qxd6 Qxd6 I have nothing there. Let me reconsider - Qxd6 Qxd6 loses my queen for free unless I recapture. Nothing recaptures d6. So Qxd6?? Qxd6 just loses the queen. Bad.
Let me take Qd5, hitting b7 and e5/e6. Black plays Qd7. Solid developing move. Actually let me just develop safely with O-O.
Qxd6 is refuted by Qxd6. So castle and keep pressure on the e5/d6 weaknesses.
Thought for 13 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
I can win a pawn with Qxd6. Let me check for tactics.
Qxd6 grabs the d6 pawn. After Qxd6, Black could play ...Qxd6? No, my queen would be defended... actually let me check. After Qxd6, is my queen safe? Black's queen is on d8, so Qxd6 attacks it - wait, no, Qd8 is on d8 and my queen goes to d6. Qd8 attacks d6. So ...Qxd6 recaptures. That loses my queen for pawn+queen trade... actually Qxd6 Qxd6 is just trading queens and I win a pawn. But wait, is d6 defended? Only by the queen on d8. So Qxd6 Qxd6 — but then I've given queen for queen+pawn, netting a pawn. That's fine.
Let me verify: after 13.Qxd6 Qxd6, material — I captured d6 pawn (queen takes pawn), then black queen takes my queen. Net: I win one pawn. Good, clean pawn up.
Thought for 13 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
Wait, the material balance shows -9 but let me recount. The queens are traded. I can win a pawn with Bxa6, which grabs a free pawn since the b-knight doesn't defend a6 effectively.
After Bxa6, if ...Nxa6 then Nxa6? No, Nb3 doesn't reach a6. Let me check: bishop takes a6, then black knight from b8 can take with Nxa6. That trades bishop for pawn - bad.
Actually Bxa6 bxa6 loses bishop for pawn. Let me check if a6 is defended: b7 pawn defends a6, and Nb8 defends a6. So Bxa6 is just losing a piece.
Let me evaluate the true material. Both sides have equal material actually - the -9 balance seems wrong given the position. I have B+2N... no, I have one bishop, one knight, two rooks. Black has bishop, knight, two rooks. Equal.
I'll develop and target the weak e6/e5 pawns and Black's exposed king.
Thought for 35 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
I'm down material. Let me look for the best move. Bxe6+ wins a pawn back.
After Bxe6+ Kh8, I've won a pawn. Let me check: the bishop captures on e6 with check. Black recaptures? The bishop on e6 is not defended by Black - after Bxe6+ Kh8, my bishop sits on e6. Rooks on f8 could take? Rf8 to... no, Rxf1+ is possible but then I have Rxf1 and my bishop is on e6 defended by nothing but it's safe. Actually let me verify e6 defenders: only the king was defending via e6-f7 area. After Bxe6+ Kh8, bishop on e6 attacked by Rf8? No, Rf8 doesn't attack e6. Good, I win a pawn.
Thought for 8 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
I'm down material significantly. Let me look for active play. Nd4 centralizes my knight and challenges the position, offering a trade if Black takes with the knight.
Actually, Nc5 attacks the queen and the b7 pawn. After Nc5, Black must move the queen, then I can take b7 or a6.
Let me check: Nc5 attacks Qe6 and b7. Black queen moves, then Nxb7 or Nxa6 wins a pawn back.
Thought for 15 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
I'm down material. Let me grab a pawn while my knight is well-placed.
Nxb7 wins a pawn. After Nxb7, the knight attacks nothing critical but grabs a pawn. Let me check safety - after Nxb7, Black might play Rab8 attacking the knight, then I retreat Nc5 or Na5. But knight could be trapped.
Nxa6 also grabs a pawn. After Nxa6 bxa6, I lose the knight for a pawn - bad. Nxa6 is defended? The b7 pawn defends a6... no, b7 pawn captures a6. So Nxa6 loses knight for pawn.
Nxb7: after ...Rab8, knight escapes via Nc5 or Na5. Let me verify Na5 - then Rb4 or similar, but knight is safe enough and I've won a pawn, reducing my deficit.
Thought for 14 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
I'm down significant material (a piece and pawn for two pawns effectively). I need to activate my rooks and stay solid.
Thought for 11 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
I'm down significant material. Rd7 attacks the 7th rank pawns and is active.
Thought for 28 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
I'm down significant material. Let me look for tactics. Rxg7+ leads to Kxg7 and I don't gain enough.
Let me check Rxd8 Rxd8, then I have Rf1 still active. But I'm just down material.
Rxg7+ Kxg7 loses the rook for a pawn - bad.
Let me consider Rd5 attacking e5 and staying active. Actually the exchange on d8: Rxd8 Rxd8 keeps material balance same but simplifies while I'm down.
Best practical try: keep rook on 7th active. Rd5 hits e5 pawn. If ...Rxd5, that's not possible (rook on d8 defends). Rd5 attacks e5 (defended by Bg5? No, Bg5 doesn't defend e5). e5 is undefended! Rd5 wins the e5 pawn? Rd5 then Rxe5 next. But Black can defend with ...Re8 or ...Rd6.
Actually Rd5 attacks e5 and is defended by nothing but Black can play ...e4 or ...Rxd5. Rd8 defends d5? No. My Rd5 could be taken by ...Rxd5 - no, Black rook on d8 vs my rook on d5, they're on same file, ...Rxd5 is legal. Then I lost my rook. Bad.
Let me just grab g7 pawn or trade. Rxd8 Rxd8 simplifies but I'm losing. I'll take the pawn on e5 via Rd5 is unsafe.
Rxg7+ Kxg7 loses rook. No.
Given I'm down a piece, I'll trade rooks to reduce Black's attacking force: Rxd8.
Thought for 8 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
Written analysis
I'm down significant material. My queen is gone, black has queen, rook, knight, bishop. I need to defend and target the c2 pawn which black's queen is attacking.
The queen on b2 attacks c2. Let me defend it with Rc1.
Thought for 8 s. The provider returned no reasoning text for this move.
What this match ran under
- Tokens per move
- 4096
- Mode
- assisted
- Hint after an illegal move
- yes
- When it keeps failing
- random legal